"In the context of the order, it could mean something as innocuous as 'name' or 'identify,' or something much more violent," they wrote. The civil liberties group said it's not convinced the judge's order is essential to protect the administration of justice.ĪCLU attorneys Brett Max Kaufman, Ben Wizner and Brian Hauss wrote that restrictions that seek to stop Trump from "targeting" prosecutors and witnesses are vague because it's not clear what "targeting" might mean. "Undisputed testimony cited by the government demonstrates that when Defendant has publicly attacked individuals, including on matters related to this case, those individuals are consequently threatened and harassed," the judge wrote.īut in a friend-of-the-court brief filed Wednesday, the ACLU said voters have a right to hear what Trump has to say, especially as he runs to return to the White House in 2024. District Judge Tanya Chutkan imposed a limited gag order on Trump, barring him from making inflammatory remarks about special counsel Jack Smith and his team, court employees and likely witnesses in the federal election interference case against him in Washington, D.C. "As much as we disagreed with Donald Trump's policies, everyone is entitled to the same First Amendment protection against gag orders that are too broad and too vague."Įarlier this month, U.S. "f we allow his free speech rights to be abridged, we know that other unpopular voices - even ones we agree with - will also be silenced," said Anthony D. The American Civil Liberties Union sued former President Donald Trump or his administration more than 400 times during his tenure in the White House.īut now the ACLU is siding with Trump in the criminal case that charges he conspired to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power - telling a judge that a gag order she's imposed sweeps too broadly in restraining Trump's speech.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |